About Me

Name: TheCapitalist
Email: moneyareus@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

MY OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA REGARDING THE "PAY CZAR"

October 30, 2009


President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave
District of Columbia  20500

Dear President Obama,

I am deeply concerned and angered by the unconstitutional, illegal, and tyrannical actions taken recently by the administration’s “pay czar”.  While I personally am not financially affected by this action, I find myself repeatedly asking the question, “What country am I living in?”
 
How does this happen in a “free” society?  What gives this unelected, unconfirmed man the authoritarian power, to use the full force of the federal government, to order that private companies set their executive pay according to his whim?
 
Does the Constitution change because the government decides to insanely “bail out” (also unconstitutional) or make loans to private companies?  What about this new relationship uniquely gives the government exclusive kneecapping powers.
 
Using the “bailouts” as justification to eliminate constitutionally protected, individual, and property rights is illogical at best and treasonous at worst.  Does the Chinese government, who has loaned our government trillions of dollars, in essence “bailing out “ our reckless, irresponsible spending, now have the right to set the pay of our politicians and citizens?  Why not?  What is the difference?
 
The administration’s strategy of stoking the fires of class warfare, to distract from their abuse of power, has resulted in the “populist outrage” against the nation’s CEO’s.  The “Special Master of Compensation” admitted that “populist outrage” about CEO pay influenced his decision and therefore, the government’s actions.  Does this not place our country in the category of dangerously being governed by “mob rule” rather than by the Founder’s intention of “rule of law”?  Where and when does this end?  How do you justify this?
 
Adding to this molestation of freedom is the unbelievable, disturbing, and shocking contention by the president that he didn’t know about the “pay czar’s” actions beforehand.  If the president didn’t know, then it even gives more questions to the legitimacy of Mr. Feinberg’s actions.  How does an unelected, unconfirmed “czar” walk into private American companies and cut certain targeted citizens’ pay 50% - 90% without the president knowing?  Did Mr. Feinberg usurp this unparalleled power without even receiving the president’s authorization or orders?  Believing this makes Mr. Feinberg’s actions even more egregious.
 
President Obama recently said, “We believe in success.  But, it does offend our values when executives of big financial firms, firms that are struggling, pay themselves huge bonuses even as they continue to rely on taxpayer assistance to stay afloat.”
 
President Obama, what offends American values is your Marxist philosophy and draconian government that is 100% “on taxpayer assistance to stay afloat”.  It is not free markets or free enterprise or capitalism, true American values that offends Americans.  It is not the government’s job to define “success” or determine how much is too much.
 
It is also not your job, or the government’s, to bail out private companies, rewarding failure and poor decisions, while punishing success by over-taxing those who made good decisions.  Your government’s reckless course toward fiscal suicide offends American values.
 
What qualifies any politician, including you, President Obama, to browbeat American business leaders when you’re spending the country into bankruptcy?  Any private business ran like the federal government would have their entire management behind bars.
 
I agree with the administration and the “pay czar’s” “pay for performance” plan.  However, the target is wrong.  It is time to put government parasites on a “pay for performance” plan, eliminating all pay to politicians until the budget is balanced.
 
The federal government must be returned to its constitutionally mandated status of being “limited”.  The actions of the “pay czar” are a violation of constitutional limits and an attack against freedom and every principle that this nation was founded upon.  Our Founding Fathers did not go to war to bring us a government so intrusive and overreaching that it controls private companies while allowing them the semblance of ownership.  That is fascism and the American people won’t stand for it.
 
I urge you in the strongest terms to reverse and discontinue the unconstitutional acts of the “pay czar” and to eliminate his position immediately and permanently.

Sincerely,

Matthew Burke
17652 NE 119th CT
Redmond, WA  98052
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SOCIALISM VS. COMMUNISM

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SOCIALISM AND COMMUNISM?

What is the difference between communism and socialism? There is no major difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same eventual end. Communism sets forth enslavement of the population by means of force, socialism -- by vote. It is like the difference between murder and suicide. One is death by force, one is death voluntarily.

Socialism may be established by force, as in the old Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), or by vote, as in Nazi (National Socialist) Germany. The extent of socialism may be complete, as in the former USSR, or partial, as experienced in the United States of America. The basic principle, in all cases, is the same.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA'S TRICKLE UP POVERTY AND THE FAILURE OF OBAMANOMICS



Obama's Trickle up poverty, also known as Obamanomics, has been an abysmal failure in only six months.  So far, we've seen another two million jobs get stimulated up in smoke, two major bailed out car companies file for bankruptcy in spite of receiving billions in taxpayer welfare, and long-term interest rates in the bond markets almost double. 

Unemployment is now 9.4%, a 25 year high, and growing.  Mr. Obama's administration had projected a rate in the eights at this point. And the number of people out of work six months or more rose to nearly 4 million in May, a record and triple the total from when the recession began. Many economists say the jobless rate will hit 10 percent by the end of this year and will keep rising into 2010. Some economists think it could near 11 percent. The highest since World War II was 10.8 percent at the end of 1982.

So much for stimulus!  Any more stimulus and soup lines are going to come back in style.  Of course the sycophants in the mainstream media, the Obama worship team, put the most positive possible spin on the additional hundreds of thousands of newly unemployed every month.  An increase of 345,000 in unemployment is reported as a decrease because it's a lower "increase" than the 504,000 the prior month (April) for example.  Can you imagine the doom and gloom broadcasts we'd be hearing if a conservative were president.  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BOYCOTT GOVERNMENT MOTORS

Americans should boycott the new GM, Government Motors (aka: Obama Motors), until the government is completely out of the automobile industry.  They have no business attempting to run a private company, even in the short term.  They can't even manage their own failed enterprises, and I see no constitutional authority for the federal government to own car companies, whatsoever.
We are not supposed to be a fascist country, but Obama's hostile takeover of GM cannot be categorized as anything but complete fascism and an attack on freedom, free markets, capitalism, and free enterprise.
Think about it.  The government idiots are actually thinking they can manage a car company! The same imbeciles that have a perfect track record of never running a successful, sustainable enterprise.  They can't even turn a profit in industries that they have legal monopolies in, like the U. S. Postal Service.
Having government bureaucrats running private companies opens up multiple cans of worms. Is there one American that thinks the inefficient government can lead GM to efficiency?  They're going to tell GM how to cut waste?  Puleaze!  And, how do they determine which plants to close? What kind of political favors will be thrown about to stem off closings in particular politicians proverbial backyards? You can almost feel the political back-scratching happening.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

IS SUPREME COURT JUSTICE NOMINEE SONIA SOTOMAYOR A RACIST?



Is Supreme Court Justice nominee Sonia Sotomayor a racist?  

The accusation comes primarily from racially insensitive comments she made during a 2001 lecture at the University of California-Berkeley. Referring to comments made by former Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, in which she said that, "a wise old man and a wise old woman will reach the same conclusion in deciding cases," Sotomayor said,
"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."
Ms. Sotomayor should be asked what about her background makes her decision making ability, when it comes to interpreting law, superior to that of a white male. She should be asked what makes her experiences richer than anyone else of any other racial background.  She should be asked if white males should not be considered for her potential post because their experience isn't as rich as hers apparently is.

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CRAIG T. NELSON GOES 'JOHN GALT' ON GLENN BECK: Will not pay more taxes and willing to go to jail.

Craig T. Nelson said on the popular Fox News Glenn Beck show today that he was going to stop paying taxes and was willing to go to jail for it. The conversation sounded like John Galt's famous speech in the classic 1957 novel,Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand.  

In reference to Nelson's home state of California (which is asking the federal government to guarantee its debt), Nelson said:  "It's no longer a state.  It's a hedge fund.  I have a solution. There's only one way.  We've gotta make them...we've got to make people stand up for their responsibilities.  They were accountable, and they haven't been.  No one is accountable anymore for anything.  No one did anything wrong. You're to blame, that's to blame. As an investor, as someone who gets taxed an awful lot, I just say, I'm not going to pay 'till you guys can show me that you're fiscally responsible." 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HOLD YOUR BREATH! OBAMA'S CAP AND TRADE (NATIONAL ENERGY TAX) PROPOSAL IS NOT A PIPE DREAM


"We can’t drive our SUVs, and eat whatever we want, and keep our homes at 72 [degrees] all the time, whether we live in the desert or the tundra, and keep consuming 25% of the world’s resources with just 4% of the world’s population... That’s not going to happen." 

HOLD YOUR BREATH! I realize that these words fell on deaf ears, because they were spoken with such confidence, eloquence, and grace, when President Obama said them on the campaign trail last year. Little did we know that President Barack Obama WAS DEADLY SERIOUS when he made that radical statement. 

He's actually trying to do it...by force! 

And the slick method being used to bring about this extreme and regressive change in your standard of living is the so-called, obscure, "cap and trade" legislation which is rapidly making its way through Congress. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA REFUSES TO MEET WITH NEVADA GOVERNOR!

 

 



Nevada Governor Jim Gibbons was notified today that President Barack Obama has refused to meet with him and other key business leaders from the State. Governor Gibbons requested the meeting in a letter to President Obama so the President could address statements he made that were critical to Nevada and have caused economic damage to convention business and tourism business in the Silver State.

Earlier this year, the President told an audience in Elkhart, Indiana, "You can't get corporate jets. You can't go take a trip to Las Vegas or go down to the Super Bowl on the taxpayer's dime." That quote was seen by many as an insult to Las Vegas and as a message to companies across the Nation to stay away from Las Vegas for corporate meetings and conventions.


 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA REFUSES TO MEET WITH NEVADA GOVERNOR!

 

 



Nevada Governor Jim Gibbons was notified today that President Barack Obama has refused to meet with him and other key business leaders from the State. Governor Gibbons requested the meeting in a letter to President Obama so the President could address statements he made that were critical to Nevada and have caused economic damage to convention business and tourism business in the Silver State.

Earlier this year, the President told an audience in Elkhart, Indiana, "You can't get corporate jets. You can't go take a trip to Las Vegas or go down to the Super Bowl on the taxpayer's dime." That quote was seen by many as an insult to Las Vegas and as a message to companies across the Nation to stay away from Las Vegas for corporate meetings and conventions.


 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tyrant Fascist Dictator Obama Cuts Chrysler's Advertising Budget in Half

Is this the United States of America, or have we been taken over by Venezuela and Hugo Chavez?  Somebody slap me!  I can hardly believe my eyes, but this is an actual headline from Advertising Age on their website: "Obama Halves Chrysler's Planned Marketing Budget". How can they write this with a straight face?

Chrysler wanted to spend $134 million in advertising over the nine weeks it's anticipated to be in bankruptcy, but the US Treasury's auto-industry task force, which is under the authority of President Obama, said they were only allowed to spend half of that amount.  

Is this an abuse of power, or what?  What in the U. S. Constitution gives the president of the United States the power to tell a private company how much they can spend on advertising?  

If Chrysler competitor GM, which is now flirting with the very real possibility of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing itself, is curious how much power the president will assume over their marketing, this is the answer: Unlimited!  This is literally the government of the United States taking over the automobile business!  This is not the United States of America that the founders intended or that you and I grew up in.  This is fascism!  This is a dictatorship, not a representative republic and not a democracy. Did you elect Barack Obama to bully car companies?    

This is a matter of founding principles that have just been flushed.  This actually happened! This is not a joke!  What's he going to do next, design a car and call it the Obamamobile? This should make every American mad as hell!

READ MORE

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tyrant Fascist Dictator Obama Cuts Chrysler's Advertising Budget in Half

Is this the United States of America, or have we been taken over by Venezuela and Hugo Chavez?  Somebody slap me!  I can hardly believe my eyes, but this is an actual headline from Advertising Age on their website: "Obama Halves Chrysler's Planned Marketing Budget". How can they write this with a straight face?

Chrysler wanted to spend $134 million in advertising over the nine weeks it's anticipated to be in bankruptcy, but the US Treasury's auto-industry task force, which is under the authority of President Obama, said they were only allowed to spend half of that amount.  

Is this an abuse of power, or what?  What in the U. S. Constitution gives the president of the United States the power to tell a private company how much they can spend on advertising?  

If Chrysler competitor GM, which is now flirting with the very real possibility of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing itself, is curious how much power the president will assume over their marketing, this is the answer: Unlimited!  This is literally the government of the United States taking over the automobile business!  This is not the United States of America that the founders intended or that you and I grew up in.  This is fascism!  This is a dictatorship, not a representative republic and not a democracy. Did you elect Barack Obama to bully car companies?    

This is a matter of founding principles that have just been flushed.  This actually happened! This is not a joke!  What's he going to do next, design a car and call it the Obamamobile? This should make every American mad as hell!

 

READ MORE

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Destruction of Regulation


The destruction of government regulation is taking it's toll on business and our society as a whole. It is out of control and should be greatly diminished, streamlined, simplified, if not eliminated before it wreaks more havoc on the United States economy.

Presently, The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) is the classification of the extensive rules and regulations (sometimes called administrative law) published in the Federal Register by the numerous departments and agencies of our beloved Federal Government.  The CFR is published by another bureaucracy, the Office of the Federal Register (OFR), an agency of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).  At this time, the CFR is divided into 50 titles that act as expansive areas subject to Federal regulation.  50 Titles!

Wrapped in the warm, fuzzy blanket of "consumer protection" against "unscrupulous and dishonest business practices," regulation has become a main component of the creeping socialist machinery.  It is argued that we must have an infinite number of supposedly indispensable alphabet soup organizations, such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), to protect us from the evil "greed" of the businessperson.

However, it is precisely this "greed" of the average businessperson or to put it more accurately, their profit-motive, which is the real protector of the consumer.  READ MORE

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wanda Syke's Hate Speech Against Rush Limbaugh





Comedian Wanda Sykes was guilty of hate speech against Rush Limbaugh at Saturday evening's White House Correspondents' Dinner. The crass Sykes said, 

"Rush Limbaugh said he hopes this administration fails, so you're saying, 'I hope America fails,' you're like, 'I don't care about people losing their homes, their jobs, our soldiers in Iraq.' He just wants the country to fail. To me, that's treason." 

Sykes compared Rush Limbaugh to Usama bin Laden, the murderous leader of the 9-1-1 attacks, and wished for his physical collapse as she roasted the favorite target of liberals Saturday night at the Washington Hilton:

"He's not saying anything differently than what Usama bin Laden is saying. You know, you might want to look into this, sir (to Pres. Obama), because I think maybe Rush Limbaugh was the 20th hijacker. But he was just so strung out on OxyContin he missed his flight." 

The crowd issue a groan while Obama laughingly smiled and Sykes may have noticed a little discomfort in the room.

"Too much?" she asked.  Apparently she's tone-deaf, because her jokes quickly turned morbid: 

"Rush Limbaugh, 'I hope the country fails' -- I hope his kidneys fail, how about that? ... He needs a good waterboarding, that's what he needs." 

Obama joined the crowd in laughing at the crack about Limbaugh's demise.  

But White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs suggested Monday that Sykes' bit was considered in poor taste.  "I don't know how guests get booked," Gibbs told reporters. "I haven't talked to the president, but my guess is there are a lot of topics that are better left for serious reflection, rather than comedy -- I think there's no doubt that 9/11 is part of that."

Given the President's jolly reaction, he must not agree with his press secretary. 

I believe that Syke's comments, in wishing that Rush Limbaugh were dead (kidney failure), and comparing him...(READ MORE)

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why Sarah Palin is the Candidate to Beat in 2012

 

Sarah Palin in the candidate to beat in the 2012 Presidential race. Conservatives have been wasting their time in search of a new Ronald Reagan to emerge and lead the conservative movement and our nation. We already have one, and she's wearing a skirt! 

Ronald Reagan was one of a kind. There was no one like him, so comparisons are tough to say the least. No one had the quick wit, the communications skills, the passion, or the sense of humor that President Reagan did, but I digress. 

You want to know who the real Sarah Palin is? Just watch her speech at the Republican National Convention last year. Unlike the current President, she can speak without a teleprompter. Halfway during her inspirational speech, her teleprompter quit working properly. Many public speakers would have panicked, or at least skipped a beat. She did not. Her speach went on flawlessly, passionately, powerfully, and from the heart.

Like Reagan, Governor Palin doesn't have to stick her finger in the wind to decide what she believes on any given day. She has principles and she's sticking to them. 

Even The Great Communicator's son, Michael Reagan, said, after hearing Palin's RNC speech that:   (Read More)

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's "New Deal II" is the Raw Deal Too

 


President Obama's "New Deal II" is the Raw Deal too, just as FDR's was. FDR did not bring us out of the Depression, quite to the contrary.  He prolonged it.  

Using data collected in 1929 by the Conference Board and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, two UCLA economists, Harold Cole and Lee Ohanian, conducted a four-year study in which they concluded that FDR's policies prolonged the Great Depression by seven years.  The United States didn't climb out of the Great Depression until 1943, when our manufacturing plants were humming to meet both our own, as well as foreign military demand.
 
President Barack Obama, is often compared to the late, great liberal, iconic, Democrat President, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who history books have romanticized as being the one responsible for guiding the country through the Great Depression of the 1930's. 
FDR's "New Deal," economic plan, that consisted of massive big government spending programs, often gets credit as solving the worst economic crisis of the last century, however, nothing could be further from the truth!

Roosevelt's programs were successful, but not in the way that is typically nostalgically reminiscenced. They were extremely popular and successful politically, as evidenced by his being elected to four consecutive terms, something legally impossible today.  After Roosevelt had passed away, and during the Eisenhower administration, an amendment to the Constitution was passed limiting presidents to two consecutive terms.  

I contend that FDR may have been an excellent war-time President, which is where I believe a lot of the romantic memories generate from, but was nothing short of a disaster economically.

Fortunately, numbers don't lie, so this is something anyone above a third grade intellect can understand, but beyond the numbers, there lies no better source than Roosevelt's own Treasury Secretary (who also happened to be a close, personal friend, which even leaves more credence to his testimony), Henry Morganthau, who admitted to act to Congressional Democrats in May 1939: 
"We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work. And I have just one interest, and if I am wrong ... somebody else can have my job. I want to see this country prosperous. I want to see people get a job. I want to see people get enough to eat. We have never made good on our promises ... I say after eight years of this Administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started ... And an enormous debt to boot!"
READ MORE

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »